Author Responsibilities :

• Reporting standards: Authors reporting results of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The paper should contain sufficient details and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism:

• Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if they have used the work and/or words of others, they should ensure that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Multiple, redundant or concurrent publications: in general, authors should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Parallel submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of sources:

• Appropriate acknowledgement of the work of others must be given at all times. Authors should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the manuscript:

• Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co‐authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be named in the “Acknowledgements” section.
• The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co‐authors (according to the above definition) and no inappropriate co‐authors are included in the author’s list of the manuscript, and that all co‐authors have seen and approved of the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects:

• If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, it must be clearly stated in the manuscript.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest:

• It takes place when the author has a financial, commercial, legal, or professional relationship with other organizations which could influence his research. This is why all authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works:

• When a significant error or inaccuracy is discovered, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal’s editor and cooperate in order to either retract the paper or to publish an appropriate erratum.

Editor Responsibilities Accountability:

• The editor of a peer‐reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published, and is accountable for everything published in the journal. In making these decisions, the editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board as well as by legal requirements. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers when making publication decisions. The editor should maintain the integrity of the academic record, preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards (e.g. ethical conduct of research using animals and human subjects, publication on vulnerable subjects), and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.

Fairness:

• The editor should evaluate manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author(s). The editor will not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers and potential reviewers, and the editorial board members.

Confidentiality:

• The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Complaints and appeals:

• The publishing contacts are requested to help the editor to record and document the claim (e.g., data manipulation or fabrication, text recycling, plagiarism, research misconduct) The report should include: (i) specific information about the case (who, what, when, where, why), (ii) in case of plagiarism and text recycling, details should be given about the relevant texts/articles.

Disclosure, conflicts of interest, and other issues:

• The editor shall be guided by COPE’s Guidelines for Retracting Articles when considering retracting, issuing expressions of concern about, and issuing corrections pertaining to articles that have been published.
• Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. The editor is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
• The editor should seek to ensure a fair and appropriate peer review process. Editors should recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.

Involvement and cooperation in investigations:

• Editors should guard the integrity of the published record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct. Editors should also pursue reviewer and editorial misconduct. An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper. Editors and editorial team members are excluded from publication decisions when they are authors or have contributed to a manuscript.

Reviewer Responsibilities Contribution to editorial decisions:

• Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communication with the author, may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.

Promptness:

• Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should immediately notify the editor so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.

Confidentiality:

• Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity:

• Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Referees should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources:

• Reviewers should identify any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument was previously reported should be accompanied by a relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published data of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest:

• Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the submission.

Publisher responsibilities Complaints and appeals :

• The Publisher (Arab Society for Fungal Conservation) is obliged to collect and share with journal editors all complains and appeals against the journal, its staff, editorial board and the Publishing Company itself. The company is also obliged to inform COPE, when there is any violation of Publication Ethics in Microbial Biosystems.

Experimental Design and Statistics (Starting March 2018).

Every manuscript must include an Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis section as a subsection of the Materials and Methods that describes the experimental design and the statistical tests used in the study. Note that a good time to consult a statistician is when planning the study and planning the experimental design.

Full details of the experimental design of each individual experiment, including the within- and between-subjects factors and a full description of critical variables required for independent replication (e.g. number of animals of each sex, number of brain slices or cells evaluated per animal, number of litters for developmental studies, etc. and justification of sample size used) should be reported in the Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis section. It is critical to control for multiple comparisons and to note in the text how this has been achieved.

Authors should identify the precise statistical tests used in the Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis section. In addition, planned comparisons, details of controls and power analyses to determine sample sizes, if applicable should be reported. Describe any statistical software used to perform analyses. For highly complex and heterogeneous statistical analyses, rather than providing a list, this section can refer to where details can be found (e.g. “Statistical design for Experiment 1 can be found in the Results describing Figure 2”).

Complete results of the statistical analyses, including degrees of freedom and any estimates of effect size, should be reported in full in the Results section. Report exact p values rather than ranges (e.g. p = 0.026 rather than p < 0.05). There are many types of analyses that can be reported, but examples include F values (F(1, 72) = 14.5, p = 0.003, ANOVA), t values (t(10) = 2.98, p = 0.043, paired t-test), coefficient of determination (R2), and Bayes factors.

The Microbial Biosystems Journal encourages authors to report all data in addition to traditional line and bar graphs, using histograms, scatter plots or other means to represent the variability and complexity of the data.

If the raw data are freely available please state this and how to find them. In addition, if you have pre-registered your study, please state that in the Experimental Design.

The following resources offer helpful guidelines on how to report statistical results:

1- Hesson-McInnis, American Psychological Association. (2010) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC. http://my.ilstu.edu/~mshesso/apa_stats.htm

2- Curran-Everett & Benos Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Physiological Genomics (2004) 18(3): 249-251 http://physiolgenomics.physiology.org/content/18/3/249

3- Sarter M, Fritschy JM. Reporting statistical methods and statistical results in EJN. Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Dec;28(12):2363-2364.

Advertising Policies:

Our advertising policy is consistent with the principles as mentioned below:
1- All advertisement requests for our journals website or for in print have to be approved by our Managing Director.
2- Advertisement should be clear concise and not misleading in nature. To advertise on MBJ, please contact advertise@fungiofegypt.com
3- Advertisers may be required to submit supporting documentation to substantiate their claims. For products not regulated by the FDA or other government agencies, technical and/or scientific documentation may be required.
4- Advertisements for products not approved by the FDA that make health claims must carry the following disclaimer: “These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”
5- Advertisements should not be deceptive or misleading. Advertisements with exaggerated claims are not accepted. Advertisements are not accepted if they appear to be indecent or offensive in either text or artwork or contain negative content of a personal, racial, ethnic, sexual orientation, or religious character.
6- MBJ reserves the right to refuse an advertisement not deemed fit for the journal.
7- Arab Society for Fungal Conservation has the right to refuse any advertisement that, in its sole discretion, is incompatible with its mission or inconsistent with the values of MBJ.
8- Advertisement for the following categories is strictly prohibited:
Alcohol
Tobacco
Weapons, firearms, ammunition
Fireworks
Gambling and lottery
Pornography or related themes
Political and religious advertisements
Advertisements that claim to have a “miracle” cure or method
Advertisements directed at children
MB Journal welcome and encourages information-rich advertising, advertisements, advertising icons, and advertiser logos must be clearly distinguishable from editorial content and may require special labeling to distinguish them.
MB’s published advertising policies are not exhaustive and are subject to change at any time without notice.